Well, experiences may differ, and is definitely not satisfied I don’t sell N-I, so I don’t mind at all if someone uses it or not. I have also tested Topaz on JPEG-files but wasn´t al that impressed by that either. So it there is something else I´m thinking and that is to maybe give C1 a shot again. Unlike Photolab Capture One has sharpening that really works on my dia positives so don´t rule out C1 because sometimes C1 gives better control on sharpening too. Dia positive isn´t fun at all whatever you do to it. When preparing images it´s all about not making them worse than they are really. You can alså test the split the grain with chosing a fine grain emulation like Kodak T-max 100 or something like that. The only sharpening working in Photolab on images like this is “Bicubic Sharper” that is applied during the export process. The second best is to meet up with Fine Contrast instead to maybe 30-35 or of your choise. The best advice is just pull MIcrocontrast as far as it is possible to the negative side since too much Microcontrast gives alot of problems with dirty skies.
What I have found have worked the best for me is still Photolab - not because of Lens correction sharpening or Deep Prime or make RAW through repro photo because it´s not really but the RAW either since all the normal tools that works with RAW with digitally born images doesn´t work at all on these images. It just really smears all out so I prefer the coarser patina these images normally get by my normal method. I once used it maybe 15 years ago but a new test didn´t convince me at all. In fact, I tested it after a tip a few days here in the forum. I have scanned a lot of coarse-grained Agfa for a long time and NeatImage cant´t do all that much to these noise problems either.
0 kommentar(er)
